Dr. Evans Blog

Subject: Fwd: [AIAS] Fwd: Spacetime Energy and Global Warming
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:58:14 EDT

The Chinese are very irresponsible in this matter and the UN must impose trade sanctions on China if this continues. The greatest threat from China is nuclear proliferation, which is why a combined NATO / Russia nuclear capability is very necessary. This is purely defensive if course. Iran and North Korea are also danger spots for nuclear proliferation. This shows what out of control capitalism can do. China has a long history of violation of human rights, under Mao, seventy million people were murdered. This worse than Stalin and Hitler and all the rest of the tin pot dictators put together. Also, the closure of Ford plants in the mid West has much the same out of control capitalist motive.

cc Welsh Assembly

Will not flood you with developments on global warming Myron, as you request, but China’s position below remains entrenched. Best, Gareth

BEIJING, April 27 - Drought-hit Australia may offer a warning of how climate change threatens core human needs, as the continent’s food bowl faces the prospect of having irrigation cut off, Britain’s climate change ambassador in Beijing has said.

Canberra has said it will halt irrigation to an area that usually grows over a third of the country’s farm produce, if heavy rain does not fall in the next few weeks. “If that happens, that is not just an economic blow to Australia, it will do significant damage beyond Australia because of its effect on world food prices,” John Ashton told Reuters during a visit to the Chinese capital. “This is a current threat that almost certainly, or at least very probably, arises from human-induced climate change.” Australia faced an “unprecedentedly dangerous” drought, Australian Prime Minister John Howard said last week.

Ashton, Britain’s Special Representative on Climate Change, said growing worries about global warming should not translate into tight short-term emissions caps for developing nations. Rich countries responsible for most of the global warming gases currently in the atmosphere should instead channel more funds to poor nations to curb emissions growth, he added.

“It’s right that we should lead the effort,” he said. “Most of the excess burden of emissions which is in the atmosphere at the moment is the result of (industrial nations’) development.” “Furthermore, we have more of the capital, more of the innovative capacity, more of the capacity to shield ourselves from some of the worst consequences of climate change,” he added, echoing Beijing’s position that it should not be penalised for other countries’ past industrialisation.

Beijing could become the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gasses, overtaking the US, as early as this year, upping international pressure for action. It has rejected caps on emissions for decades to come, saying they may hurt growth. Ashton said he was not in Beijing to try to get commitments on emissions. Although prickly about rising global attention on Chinese emissions, Chinese officials are increasingly worried about temperatures that have risen faster in China than global averages and may soon threaten food and water supplies in their own country. Ashton said. “…it is on the agenda of a much wider range of people in China now including people in leadership positions who until recently would have been pretty difficult to engage with on climate change” .

–Forwarded Message Attachment– I am still interested in these topics, but I have been trying to get RFR off the ground for twelve years, so I am pushing the theory forward as far as possible without computers. An occasional reprot from GJE on global warming would be useful. In respect of spacetime energy I am interested only in a device that has been certified as ready for production, and in a device for which all details are openly available. _________________________________________________________________ Try Live.com: where your online world comes together - with news, sports, weather, and much more. http://www.live.com/getstarted=

Subject: Fwd: [AIAS] Fwd: The Complete RFR Spectrum
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:48:58 EDT

Peter Atkins’s book is very good for molecular quantum mechanics and much ESR and NMR theory can be adapted straightforwardly for RFR. I am glad to see that Peter Atkins, Fellow of Lincoln College Oxford, was elected F.R.S. because his books are bestsellers. He was my Oxford colleague at the PCL in South Parks Road.

Excellent and extremely interesting Myron - another new experimental / technological advance with ECE theory.

Best, Gareth

–Forwarded Message Attachment– This consists of the main chemically shifted resonances, which are site specific, together with spin orbit structure, fine structure from electron electron spin spin interaction, hyperfine structure from electron nuclear spin spin interaction and nuclear nuclear fine structure. The chemical shift from the main resonance line for the free electron or free proton has been worked out in note 84(3). The next note will deal with spin orbit structure, which is proportional to I / omega squared. The spin spin structure depends on the internal details of the molecule, and occurs around each of the main resonance lines as in ESR or NMR. Then there is superhyperfine structure adm so forth. All of these spectral features are induced by the CPRF pump beam without the presence of a permanent magnet. In the electron beam there is one resonance line, which is not chemically shifted and which is not split. RFR can be used for all materials: gases, liquids, liquid crystals, polymers, amorphous, gells, colloids, semiconductors, superconductors, metals and plasma, for example. In each case RFR may be used for electron spins or for proton spins. The main electron resonance line must first be found in an electron beam, and then the main proton resonance line must be found in a proton beam. If hydrogen is then used in the third experiment, with one proton and one electron, there is to be expected a chemically shifted electron resonance line split by electron proton coupling, and also a chemically shifted proton resonance line split by electron proton coupling. In ethanol for example there are three main chemically shifted lines, because there are three types of H atoms, three on the CH3 part, two on the CH2 part, and one in the OH part of the C2H5OH molecule. So the intensity ratio is 3:2:1. Ethanol is:

H3C - CH2OH

Propanol is

H3C - CH2 - CH2OH

and there are four lines, in the ratio 3 : 2: 2 : 1.

In RFR these lines can be resolved a long way apart, and fine and hyperfine detail picked up easily. In conventional NMR the only way to do this is to make a very strong magnet that has to be very homogeneous and cooled down to liquid nitrogen or liquid helium. This is increasingly expensive. In RFR, magnets are dispensed with completely and replaced by a radio frequency pump beam which is circularly polarized.

_________________________________________________________________ Try Live.com: where your online world comes together - with news, sports, weather, and much more. http://www.live.com/getstarted=

Subject: The Complete RFR Spectrum
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:22:44 EDT

This consists of the main chemically shifted resonances, which are site specific, together with spin orbit structure, fine structure from electron electron spin spin interaction, hyperfine structure from electron nuclear spin spin interaction and nuclear nuclear fine structure. The chemical shift from the main resonance line for the free electron or free proton has been worked out in note 84(3). The next note will deal with spin orbit structure, which is proportional to I / omega squared. The spin spin structure depends on the internal details of the molecule, and occurs around each of the main resonance lines as in ESR or NMR. Then there is superhyperfine structure adm so forth. All of these spectral features are induced by the CPRF pump beam without the presence of a permanent magnet. In the electron beam there is one resonance line, which is not chemically shifted and which is not split. RFR can be used for all materials: gases, liquids, liquid crystals, polymers, amorphous, gells, colloids, semiconductors, superconductors, metals and plasma, for example. In each case RFR may be used for electron spins or for proton spins. The main electron resonance line must first be found in an electron beam, and then the main proton resonance line must be found in a proton beam. If hydrogen is then used in the third experiment, with one proton and one electron, there is to be expected a chemically shifted electron resonance line split by electron proton coupling, and also a chemically shifted proton resonance line split by electron proton coupling. In ethanol for example there are three main chemically shifted lines, because there are three types of H atoms, three on the CH3 part, two on the CH2 part, and one in the OH part of the C2H5OH molecule. So the intensity ratio is 3:2:1. Ethanol is:

H3C - CH2OH

Propanol is

H3C - CH2 - CH2OH

and there are four lines, in the ratio 3 : 2: 2 : 1.

In RFR these lines can be resolved a long way apart, and fine and hyperfine detail picked up easily. In conventional NMR the only way to do this is to make a very strong magnet that has to be very homogeneous and cooled down to liquid nitrogen or liquid helium. This is increasingly expensive. In RFR, magnets are dispensed with completely and replaced by a radio frequency pump beam which is circularly polarized.

Subject: Stern Gerlach Experiment and MRI
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:53:47 EDT

In the original Stern Gerlach experiment a beam of silver ions was used, silver having one valence electron. The beam was separated into spin up and spin down components by an inhomogeneous magnetic field, thus proving the existence of electron spin. MRI is a development of this experiment using inhomogeneous magnets. Magnetless MRI can be developed by using an inhomogeneous CPRF beam (ICPRF beam). It is better to use a modern electron beam generator than a beam of silver ions. The ICPRF beam separates the electron beam into spin up and spin down components. For spin up:

Energy = (eA(r)) squared / (2m)

for spin down:

Energy = -(eA(r) squared / (2m)

and there are forces in opposite directions due to the inhomogeneity of the pump beam. These forces move the spin up and spin down electrons in opposite directions. Magnetless MRI uses this property along with RFR chemical shifts and splittings. Here A(r) denotes the fact that A depends on r, i.e. is inhomogeneous. One way of making such an ICPRF beam is to focus it as it mixes with the electron beam. Such a magnetless MRI device would lead to a multi billion dollar industry as would magnetless NMR, and to a lesser extent, magnetless ESR.

Subject: Spacetime Energy and Global Warming
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:25:22 EDT

I am still interested in these topics, but I have been trying to get RFR off the ground for twelve years, so I am pushing the theory forward as far as possible without computers. An occasional reprot from GJE on global warming would be useful. In respect of spacetime energy I am interested only in a device that has been certified as ready for production, and in a device for which all details are openly available.

Subject: Theory of the Optical Stern Gerlach Effect
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:20:28 EDT

I will proceed to this after the theory of the spin spin and spin orbit splittings, with a few remarks on the fundamental nature of the Pauli matrices.

Subject: Fwd: RFR Spectroscopy
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:17:19 EDT

The important point Myron is the control over the resolution that this allows - the resolution is increased by tuning I / omega squared of the pump beam to levels that are far higher than is possible with conventional and cumbersome techniques. So you end up with a new and vastly improved generation of fingerprint spectra with the limit of resolution determined by this simple relationship. As you say, this has far reaching implications for analytical and diagnostic work and the experimentalists who successfully demonstrate this should be awarded a Nobel Prize (oh to be back in a lab).

Best, Gareth

–Forwarded Message Attachment– At the most rigorous level in unified physics the spin connection is present in all calculations and quantum mechanics is causal and objective, derived from geometry, all fields interact. When fields separate out and become independent the Dirac level can be used for a free fermion. ERS and NMR can then be derived semi-classically as usual. For applications the non-relativistic quantum Schrodinger Pauli level may be used as just sent over in 84(3). At this level the specific effects of the spin connection have not been considered. So what has happened in ECE is that physics has been made more precise and as required by relativity, unified by geometry and causality. This route has been based on the remarkable precision of relativity theory and by the remarkable failure of Bohr Heisenberg when the right experiments are designed, for example those by Croca et al. at Lisbon University. The calculation just sent over is similar to the internal field effect in dielectrics, (Lorenz Lorentz equation and so on). In the far infra red (see early Omnia Opera of the seventies and early eighties) the internal field effect changes the intensity (i.e. power absorprion coefficient in neper per wavenumber) of the spectrum, which is exactly what was calculated in 84(3), i.e. A(0) squared is changed by teh interanl field due to nuclei. The internal field is different for each nucleus, so each nucleus produces a different RFR frequency. This is what teh analyst is intrested in - a new spectral technique of potentially very high resolution. I opened the Gordon Conference of 1976 at the age of 26 in Holderness School New Hampshire, and present there were Nobel Laureates Lars Onsager of Yale and J. H. van Vleck of Harvard. The latter was a straightforward mid Westerner and kindly mentioned that he thought highly of my work at that time. These two greatly contributed to the theory of dielectrics and quantum mechanics. Also there was Robert Cole of Brown University and John Deutch of Harvard, who became a Presidential Science Advisor. I was jet lagged and still asleep, so the lecture went well, I did not know that these guys were sitting in the front row. It was my first trip to the US.

Civil List Scientist. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself: design your homepage the way you want it with Live.com. http://www.live.com/getstarted=

Completely agreed about the need to be back in UW Aberystwyth! This technique, and of course theory, could be developed there with a group similar to our 1974 - 1983 group. All that is needed is a bit of imagination from the UWA administration and Welsh Assembly. The devastating damage done by the wholesale destruction of EDCL is now very evidently harming the development of science in Wales. The people who did this are no longer active, all have retired long ago. I would like to develop a field theory group at UWA consisting of leading AIAS scholars, Welsh members and foreign members alike. From feedback it is seen that all UW institutes regularly study ECE theory, so there is a clear need for coordination and dialogue around a table to sort this out.

cc Welsh Assembly

Subject: Ortho Positronium Anomaly
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:49:39 EDT

Unless I am missing something as yet, it seems to me that this is easily explained with the Pauli exclusion principle (without any need for qed), so in paper 85, with Horst Eckardt and Stephen Crothers, it may be appropriate to approach this subject by deriving the Pauli exclusion principle from Cartan geometry via the Dirac equation and then applying it to ortho-positronium which consists of a positron and electron in the same spin state. The exclusion principle can be derived in quantum field theory (e.g. Ryder). The introduction of colour symmetry in strong field theory is the same type of problem because quarks are fermions. Having derived the Dirac equation already in the limit of the free fermion, the existence of anti-particles such as the positron has also been derived already in ECE theory, and also of course the half integral spin of Dirac. To derive the Pauli principle the technique known as second quantization must be used because the interaction of fermions must be considered - the Pauli principle applies to more than one fermion by definition. We also need to derive Fermi Dirac statistics in ECE theory using the same method as the one used to derive the Pauli principle. This can also be doen in quantum field theory. The Pauli principle states that no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state, i.e. half integral spins must be opposite in degenerate energy levels. The degeneracy is lifted by a static magnetic field or as we have seen in RFR, by a CPRF beam. The magnetic field produces the Zeeman effect in atomic spectra, and the Stern Gerlach effect in an electron beam. The CPRF beam produces the optical equivalents of these effects. The optical Stern Gerlach effect could be observed at Prague using a focused or inhomogeneous CPRF beam. This is the basic experiment for the development of magnetless MRI. The magnetic Stern Gerlach effect needs an inhomogenous magnet, and electrons of opposite spin are separated. This led directly to the Dirac equation about 1924 or 1925. So I will see if there is anything in quantum field theory that allows an anti-fermion and fermion of the same spins to occupy the same orbital, at present I don’t see anything that allows this violation of the PAuli principle, so ortho positronium cannot exist according to Pauli. It therefore decay stentimes faster than the positronium with opposite spins. This is useful in applying ECE to quantum field theory and second quantization, light squeezing and so on.

Subject: Typo in Note 84(3)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:29:05 EDT

There should be an A(0) in the denominator in eqns (43) and (44), i.e. the denominator should be

( 2 root 2 pi r cubed A(0)) squared

This means that the RFR chemical shift depends on root I / omega. The basic RFR resonance frequency depends on I / omega squared, as do the spin spin and spin orbit splittings which I will work out next.

Subject: Levels of Approximation in Unified Physics
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:12:48 EDT

At the most rigorous level in unified physics the spin connection is present in all calculations and quantum mechanics is causal and objective, derived from geometry, all fields interact. When fields separate out and become independent the Dirac level can be used for a free fermion. ERS and NMR can then be derived semi-classically as usual. For applications the non-relativistic quantum Schrodinger Pauli level may be used as just sent over in 84(3). At this level the specific effects of the spin connection have not been considered. So what has happened in ECE is that physics has been made more precise and as required by relativity, unified by geometry and causality. This route has been based on the remarkable precision of relativity theory and by the remarkable failure of Bohr Heisenberg when the right experiments are designed, for example those by Croca et al. at Lisbon University. The calculation just sent over is similar to the internal field effect in dielectrics, (Lorenz Lorentz equation and so on). In the far infra red (see early Omnia Opera of the seventies and early eighties) the internal field effect changes the intensity (i.e. power absorprion coefficient in neper per wavenumber) of the spectrum, which is exactly what was calculated in 84(3), i.e. A(0) squared is changed by teh interanl field due to nuclei. The internal field is different for each nucleus, so each nucleus produces a different RFR frequency. This is what teh analyst is intrested in - a new spectral technique of potentially very high resolution. I opened the Gordon Conference of 1976 at the age of 26 in Holderness School New Hampshire, and present there were Nobel Laureates Lars Onsager of Yale and J. H. van Vleck of Harvard. The latter was a straightforward mid Westerner and kindly mentioned that he thought highly of my work at that time. These two greatly contributed to the theory of dielectrics and quantum mechanics. Also there was Robert Cole of Brown University and John Deutch of Harvard, who became a Presidential Science Advisor. I was jet lagged and still asleep, so the lecture went well, I did not know that these guys were sitting in the front row. It was my first trip to the US.

Civil List Scientist.