Subject: 15-31March08, rest of world feedback to www.aias.us
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:01:14 EDT
Univ Tasmania, AEI Canada, DM Solutions Canada, Government of Canada, HA China, UOI Greece (missed from Europe section), IMSC India, TUS Japan, KAIST S Korea, Postech S. Korea, NU Singapore, Univ Johannesburg South Africa, Government of South Africa.
Subject: 15-31March08, Europe feedback to www.aias.us
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:46:39 EDT
Technokontakte Austria, ETH Zurich, ZKB Switzerland, Charles Univ Prague, Siemens Germany, Univ Hohenheim, Univ Karlsruhe, CSIC Spain, UGR Spain, Ensieta France, Lisif France, Univ Poitiers, KFKI Hungary, PGSM Hungary, Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Technion Israel, ISI Italy, Univ Modena Italy, Univ Pavia Italy, Univ Groningen, Macropion Portugal, UCV Romania, CN Russia, Helios Russia, MTS-NN Russia, Univ Bath, Univ Greenwich, Napier Institute, Univ Sheffield, Univ. Swansea.
Subject: 15-31March08 ; USA Feedback activity to www.aias.us
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:23:44 EDT
As usual this is a small sample of the huge amount of monthly interest from the USA in _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) , concentrating on the higher eduational, government and military sectors, with a few big name corporations.
Berkeley, Buffalo, Harvard, Northwestern, New York Institute of Technology, San Francisco unified school district, Univ of Colorado Denver, UCLA, Univ Florida, Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign, Marietta County Georgia, St Lucie County California, Charleston Airforce Base, Robins Airforce Base, Delavan Darien school district, Mobile Gas, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon.
Subject: Fwd: Laplace and the Crysatl Spheres
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:14:57 EDT
Thanks very much once more! It is great to see how Kerry weaves together strands of history into a readable book that is always popular now on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) . He has gained a steady worldwide readership, and well deserved too!
Dear Myron,
Please find below the latest page of Crystal Spheres.
6. The French Connection.
Lavoisier made important contributions to chemistry, working as a hobby scientist in Paris. Lavoisier experimentally proved that mass is conserved in chemical reactions, named oxygen and made a list of the substances that could not be broken further chemically. However, Lavoisier’s day job was collecting taxes from the poor people of France. This did not make him popular with Parisians and his head was first under the guillotine when the revolution came!
Pierre Simon de Laplace (1749-1827) was more successful than Lavoisier in revolutionary France, being able to change with the times. Whereas Lavoisier had done important work in chemistry, Laplace made groundbreaking advances in mathematics and physics. Laplace was the Isaac Newton of France and was able to advance Newton’s work sufficiently to remove the need for a divine intervention in the equilibrium of the solar system, which had been believed in by Newton. Napoleon even had a conversation with Laplace on the subject and was impressed that Laplace could dispense with the almighty in matters concerning the movement of heavenly bodies, showing that both men were great supporters of the cause of deterministic physics. Laplace’s insights were published in his five volume work Mécanique Céleste (1799-1825), which was translated into English by the Civil List Scientist Mary Fairfax-Somerville (1780-1872). Mary Fairfax-Somerville was a Scottish science writer, mathematician and astronomer who had Somerville College Oxford named after her. Laplace’s work covered diverse aspects of physics and mathematics and in some respects his work updating Newton’s insights created the subject of physics in its modern incarnation.
Meanwhile in London, Count Rumford had decided that British science would benefit from a new meeting place for experimental work, debate and public lectures. Rumford played a vital role in the setting up of the Royal Institution and soon Sir Humphry Davy was separating the group 1 and group 2 metallic elements using the world’s biggest battery in the basement of the building. Unfortunately for Rumford, his penchant for spying for foreign governments did not endear him to the British establishment and he wisely relocated his scientific endeavors to Paris, where he married Lavoisier’s widow. Napoleon was a great lover of science and so Davy and Faraday were welcomed to Paris to meet with Rumford for scientific and social purposes even though Britain and France were at War! By the end of the nineteenth century Paris would be the centre of research into radioactivity, with Becquerel and the Curies making the vital discoveries that led to the foundation of the nuclear power industry that is today a vital source of energy in France.
Kerry
Subject: Fwd: more Standard Model stupidity
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:11:39 EDT
Dear Prof. Evans,
Have a gander at this claptrap. The Standard Modellers take this rubbish seriously.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/science/29collider.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Steve Crothers
I agree, this is awful nonsense, and funding for this kind of thing is a total waste of considerable public resource. As you have shown meticulously, in the face of some terrible treatment, black holes cannot exist, and these fellows are also trying to ignore the fact that the EH equation is geometrically incorrect. The British Government is beginning to wake up to this after a long slumber, and not before time. I think that the Government is beginning to realize that these fellows fund themselves to predict the end of the world by creating a big black hole. The Pit and the Pendulum is nothing compared to this story. This is the weirdest stuff, the Salvador Dali of science except that Dali was a good artist.
cc Prime Minister’s Office and Welsh Assembly.
Subject: FOR POSTING : Reply to Bruhn et. al
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:49:21 EDT
I will post this on the AIAS site but with a footnote to the effect that Bruhn appears to be a pseudo-scientist paid to harass the AIAS group. He is also known to harass other scientists with original ideas for years on end, even following them around to lectures they give. He has been warned that if he continues to harass a court order may be taken out against him in Darmstadt. I have told him many times not to harass peopel with whom I correspond. I tis obviosu that he has ignored teh written warning, so is now open to legal proceedings. Not to waste the time of busy people it is best I think to just ignore him. If anyone is in the least bit concerned any longer with any of his activities, please let me know and I will straighten him out again mathematically. He has consistently abused my e mail listings, and that is how he came across your work. I haev many times pointed out thet he contribves errors where none exist, and he cannt possibly an expert in every field, so there is no need to give Bruhn the recognition of a colleague. He is just a retored individual who has been witnessed to commit aggravated harassment, a serious felony. Worst, he is known to have harassed employers of scientists with any new ideas that eh takes a dislike to, so his intentions are anything but friendly.
Dear Prof. Evans,
I have now completed my reply to Bruhn et. al, revealing the warts and all. If you wish you can link it or post it to the AIAS, but there is no obligation, bearing in mind the ugly warts. Here is the URL:
www.geocities.com/theometria/BHLetters.html
Steve Crothers.
Subject: Simple Explanation of the Problem with EH Theory
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 04:03:35 EDT
The simplest explanation is that the Bianchi identity developed by Cartan is the exact identity:
D ^ T := R ^ q —————————- (1)
and its Hodge dual is
D ^ T tilde := R tilde ^ q ——————————- (2)
before the development of ECE theory, the Hodge dual identity (2) was unknown. These are exact identities of Cartan geometry which show that torsion (T) is as fundamental as curvature (R). Einstein Hilbert (EH) theory uses
T = 0, T tilde = 0 —————————- (3)
This assumption implies
R ^ q = 0 (EH) —————————– (4)
and
R tilde ^ q = 0 (EH) ———————————– (5)
The assumption (3) also implies that the connection must be the symmetric or Christoffel connection in all exact solutions of the EH equation.
In paper 93 it was found that eq. (5) is NOT true in general for the Christoffel connection. Therefore the Christoffel connection violates eq. (2), which is just as fundamental as eq. (1). In other words it was found in paper 93 that many exact solutions of the EH equation (in fact all non vacuum solutions) violate eq. (2). See also the extra plots file of paper 93. There is no way in which these computer algebra results can be challenged logically, so EH theory must be considered as obsolete. In papers 93 to 108 we are systematically beginning to forge a new relativity theory which properly obeys the Bianchi identity. The overall result is that all physics is Cartan geometry within a proportionality factor, so the theory of relativity is the basic theory of all natural philosophy. This is the main theme of the ECE papers and books on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) .
Subject: Feedback Activity for www.aias.us 1-28March08
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:43:46 EDT
There were 43,256 hits from 7,557 visitors in the last four weeks, studying 709 documents from 71 countries, led by : USA, Britain, France, Italy, Yugoslavia, Germany, Czechia, ……………… The most read documents are as follows, numbers indicating ECE papers as usual:
43, Space Energy (Spanish translation), 94, 67, 106, Johnson Magnets, Munich Workshop history slides, “Crystal Spheres”, filtered stats document, Galaxies (Spanish), Space Energy, 63, Spacetime-Dev, 6, 89 (Hehl Debate), numerical solutions, 93, 105, 17, 100a, 28, Ulrich vs. Hehl, 1, 76,45, 65, 30, 54, Tornado in a Petrie dish, GGlts, 103, ECE Engineering Model, Cosmo-7, Indanu 6a, 104, 7, 99, Galaxies, 37, 61, 15, 40, 56, 24, 44, 50, 85, 47, 57, Ricci article, 102, 23, 10, 55, 9, Hehl rebuttal, 2, 32, 42, 52, 60, IBM Code, 26, 31, 49, numerical article 3, 14, 21, 22, 35, 36, 53, 59, 90, Workshop details, 93 Extra plots, Universe3, 25, 29, 3, 46, 4, 51, 5, 92, experimental refutation of the Heisenberg principle, 12, ……….
Subject: Angular Dependence of r sub S
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:17:19 EDT
The Joddrell Bank site of 2006 mentions that there is a “wobble of the binary pulsar’s spin axis”. I assume that there is a dependence of some kind on all three coordinates, r, theta, phi, so that the plane of the orbit tilts, but the site may mean something else by the vague description “wobble”. This is also found in the Pioneer / Cassini anomalies and means that:
- T / R = function of r , theta and phi
in general. The site also claims that detectors such as LIGO can expect to see twice as many gravitational radiation events as previously thought, but the hard fact of the matter is that no event has ever been observed in 25 to 30 very expensive years. If one is observed it will be very doubtful whether it can be associated with a binary pulsar and will be due to the ECE wave equation:
(d’alembertian + kT) q sup a sub mu = 0
It will be very interesting to forge a working relation between MEU and Joddrell Bank, as indeed Prof. Pendergast has already been doing for years, doing impressive work by any standards. What is really needed is a new mindset, one that is not uncritically locked in to the obsolete EH theory, and is able to look at things afresh.
Subject: Some Observational Facts on Binary Pulsars
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:02:46 EDT
I have found a Joddrell Bank website of 2006 and the e mail addresses of three Jodrell Bank colleagues on that site: Duncan Lorimer, _drl] at [jb.man.ac.uk_ (mailto:drl] at [jb.man.ac.uk) ; Andrew Faulkner, _afaulkne] at [jb.man.ac.uk_ (mailto:afaulkne] at [jb.man.ac.uk) and Prof. Andrew Lyle, _agl] at [jb.man.ac.uk_ (mailto:agl] at [jb.man.ac.uk) . who may give us some data on precise orbital decay trajecories if known at all. This site states that the HT binary pulsar is shrinking at 1 mm a year, not 3.1 mm a year as stated on the as usual inaccurate Wikipedia. The double binary J0737-3039 (both stars pulsars) was first pointed out to us by Kerry, and this site states that it is well observed by now. So we may have access through these colleagues in future to detailed experimental data, especially as Kerry is part of a group of the twenty best astronomers in Britain, and has image enhancer techniques superior to Joddrell Bank. These will be accessible to Ph. D. students at MEU. This site states that out of 1700 known pulsars only 8 are relativistic binary pulsars. This site rolls out the usual standard model claims about gravitational radiation, but the fact of the matter is that the latter has never been observed. It is claimed that the EH theory explains double pulsars to 0.1 % but we now know that this is meaningless because EH is geometrically incorrect from the beginning. So what is really happening is that parameters are being adjusted to observed orbits. This is actually what happened from the beginning of EH, the Schwarzschild parameter alpha was adjusted to 2MG / c squared in order to reproduce Newton’s law in the weak field limit. As Steve Crothers shows there is actually no a priori reason for this. In stadnard model grand unified field theories for example there are maybe 17 to 20 adjustable parameters, many dimensions, many types of superstrings and so on. That is not science at all.