The scalar curvature from the Lemma is proportional to the scalar curvature of the mass density, which is a sum R010 + R020 + R030 In notes for paper 110 I worked out a particular example of a gamma connection. There have been so many new ideas recently that I need to pause to write up a few papers from the notes. The gamma connection can be worked out from the tetrad postulate if the spin connection and tetrad are known. So I think that your method here is valid if developed systematically. In paper 61 or 62 it thereabouts I gave an example of the ECE Lemma at work, and in a recent paper I checked it in another way for self consistency using the rule for covariant dervative of a rank three tensor. This led to a new cyclic theorem on the Cartan torsion.
Subject: Re: [AIAS] Agreed with Dr Eckardt
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:55:34 -0400
Is the definition of scalar curvature R from the wave equation the same as you used for equating with the charge density rho in your last notes? Then this could show up a way to connect rho with the potential (via the tetrad in R). The spin connection is also available (if we consider the engineering model for example), however the (asymmetric) Gamma connection remains unknown. I remember that it can possibly be calculated from spin connection via the ECE lemma. This would open then new insight for a “full feed back” calculation with a charge and current density not being predefined as in MH but resulting from the calculation. I hope this quick idea was not formulated too unintelligible 
Horst
—–Original Message—–
Sent: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:39 am
Subject: [AIAS] Agreed with Dr Eckardt
Yes agreed with Dr Eckardt. Essentially G. Bruhn is a retired individual who for about six years has?deliberately contrived?deceipt in order to give a false impression. This conduct is well out into the open now and casts further doubt about the intergity of the standard physics faction, becasue standard editors of the worst type are known to cite these deliberate errors, showing gross incompetence at best, collusion at worst. It is well known that cyberstalking is a criminal?offence, I advise readers just to?google it up. So this is the end of?stadnrd physics for many people. It has degenerated into deliberate deceipt, as is actually well known to?professionals. ?
?
????
Attached Message
From:
horsteck] at [aol.com
To:
EMyrone] at [aol.com
Subject:
Re: [AIAS] Another Instance of Cyberstalking by Bruhn
Date:
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:42:27 -0400
Just to be totally correct: shouldn’t it read
??? R sup b sub nu
at the right hand side of the last formula (relabelled eq. 1)?
Horst
—–Original Message—–
Sent: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 8:26 pm
Subject: [AIAS] Another Instance of Cyberstalking by Bruhn
Another incident of cybertstalking by Bruhn?occurred today and the scientific refutation is attached. The usual method was used of setting up a false claim, in this case that eq. (1) of the attached could not be true. This equation was falsely claimed to be involved in the proof of the ECE Lemma, and so I give the real proof. This incident was duly reported to the police and shreds any remaining credibility that this man may have. He also attempted to use?my listserver address, without my permission of coruse, and was automatically?blocked by Sean?MacLachlan’s anti-spam software. He apparently picked up this listserver address from somewhere.?We?are now entitled to apply for a court restraining order against this man adn to formally report him to the Darmstadt police for?cyberstalking and five years of harassment.?We?reall ymust leave these ancient mariners of the standard model in our wake. They are out of touch with reality and the modern world.??
?
Civil List Scientist
Manage your list subscription at http://lists.somewhere.ws/mailman/listinfo/aias
Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news, & more!
Manage your list subscription at http://lists.somewhere.ws/mailman/listinfo/aias