Subject: Fwd: AW: Paper by Tajmar et al.
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:05:10 EDT
This paper raises many questions. They report on a „parity violation effect“ that the result was pronounced in the clockwise direction of ring rotation only. What does that mean? Does earth gravity play a role? Can such parity violation be inferred by SCR? I would not expect such effects from the gravitomagnetic field alone.
Horst
—–Ursprüngliche Nachricht—– Von: EMyrone] at [aol.com [mailto:EMyrone] at [aol.com] Gesendet: Samstag, 30. August 2008 13:57 An: ted] at [annis.org; fdamador] at [comcast.net; sean] at [somewhere.ws; dave] at [annexa.net; HorstEck] at [aol.com; geesquared] at [gmail.com; kp.phys] at [btinternet.com; karel.jelinek] at [gmail.com; thenarmis] at [yahoo.com; J.Dunning-Davies] at [hull.ac.uk; aje] at [warfplc.com; anthony.fucilla] at [btinternet.com; martin.tajmar] at [arcs.ac.at Betreff: Paper by Tajmar et al.
This may be found by googling “Tajmar arxiv” and is
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0707/0707.3806.pdf
“Search for Frame Dragging Like Signals Close to Spinning Superconductors” by Tajmar et al., 18th International Conference on General Relativity adn Gravitation, Sydney, Australia, July 2007. Their Eq. (5) is essentially the same as the result obtained in paper 117 on www.aias.us. Tajmar et al report a frame dragging result eighteen orders of magnitude greater than this result. In Gravity Probe B it was below their resolution of 97 milliarcesconds a year. The Gravity Probe B experiment ha now been discontinued. In ECE theory the B sub go of Tajmar et al. is denoted cap omega. Tajmar et al. also report a parity violating effect. It is conceivable that the eighteen order of magnitude discrepancy between Tajmar et al. and Gravity Probe B is due to spin connection resonance. I attach the final version of paper 117 for Tajmar et al. Spin connection resonance mechanisms that amplified B in previous work on www.aias.us may conceivably be responsible for amplifying cap omega. There is no doubt following papers 93 ff. that the Einstein field equation is fundmanetally incorrect, by now a well accepted result. The ECE theory gives the same result as the Tajmar eq. (5). Spin connection resonance in ECE theory may give a qualitative explanation of the eighteen order of magnitude discrepancy reported here by Tajmar et al. Some scientists reject the Tajmar work outright as artifact, but I am keeping an open mind about it.
Civil List Scientist
It will be interesting if Tajmar et al. respond to paper 117. I would not expect parity violation to occur, but I try to keep open minded about these results until they are or are not proven to be artifacts. I can however proceed to develop spin connection resonance equations.