Correction of Wikipedia Misrepresentation
Subject: Correction of Wikipedia Misrepresentation
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 06:09:57 EDT
The wikipedia article on myself was originally posted without me knowing anything about it. It was originally a fair representation, but was defaced by a anonymous moderator in order to put across a grossly prejudiced view. This moderator was almost certainly A. Lakhtakia, an engineer with no knowledge of relativity. Other scientists tried to intercede and the Lakhtakia bile was gradually moderated a little. I have never bothered much with wikipedia myself, because it is so error-ridden, and the wikipedia rules state that I am not allowed to intercede to put the facts straight. If I did so I would be black listed. So much for freedom of speech. The entry is childishly prejudiced, for example my Civil List pension, a British High Honour, is censored completely, shoved under the doormat and not mentioned. This is like covering up Great Britain. It is claimed in an infantile manner that no one is interested in ECE, while our feedback sites record about five or six MILLION hits in about four and a half years. By comparing with impacts (number of hits) of other research groups, physics departments and whole schools such as chemistry at Bristol I found that _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) is out impacting the whole lot, sometimes by two orders of magnitude (a hundred times). The feedback data of _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) are precise, accurate and detailed and I record them every two weeks on the blog. EEC has been published eighteen times in three different usually refereed journals, generating about fifty referees’ repots of the usual type (anonymous). So the wikipedia entry on myself is complete bias, it covers up my whole career. My accurate biography is found in about 25 different editions of Marquis Who’s Who in America, the World and Science and Engineering. There is a rival system called knol now available, run by Yahoo. So I may start posting there. However wikipedia is farcical. The standard physics system is therefore very prejudiced against well tested new theories, accepted worldwide. This prejudice is designed to save face and save funding, save careers, failed reputations and demonstrably incorrect mathematics - in other words a gigantic fraud.
British Civil List Scientist